CVDL’s client prevails in Missouri Supreme Court employment case
January 15, 2020
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled in favor of a CVDL client pursuing a discrimination claim alleging she was wrongly fired from her job when she required the use of her guide dog. CVDL attorneys Tim Van Ronzelen and Shelly Kintzel represented the employee. The employer argued that the claim could not proceed in court because …read more
Theroff v. Dollar Tree, SC97235: Missouri Supreme Court to consider when parties must arbitrate whether a valid arbitration agreement exists
July 23, 2019
The Missouri Supreme Court will be considering whether an employee who is legally blind can be compelled to arbitrate claims against her employer when she alleges that she did not see or sign the arbitration agreement. A trial court and the Western District ruled that the employee did not have to arbitrate her claims. The …read more
Missouri Supreme Court to consider agent’s authority under a health care durable power of attorney to enter arbitration agreements
June 7, 2019
The Missouri Supreme Court will consider whether an agent with a health care durable power of attorney can agree on behalf of a patient to arbitrate any potential claims the patient may have against a nursing home. The circuit court declined to send the patient’s claims to arbitration, and the Western District affirmed. The Supreme …read more
Missouri Supreme Court to consider consumer loan arbitration case.
December 20, 2017
On December 19, 2017, the Missouri Supreme Court granted transfer in A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. v. Hunter. The case involves an arbitration clause in a consumer loan agreement which provides for a specific arbitrator who is no longer able to serve. The trial court had found that this was an integral term of the contract …read more
The Missouri Supreme Court to consider arbitrability of a workers’ compensation retaliatory discharge claim.
December 20, 2017
The Supreme Court issued a preliminary writ of mandamus in State ex rel. Chaparro v. Youngs, SC96779. In the underlying suit, Ms. Chaparro sued U-Haul alleging that it discriminated against her for a perceived disability and retaliated against her for exercising her workers’ compensation rights in violation of § 287.780. U-Haul moved to compel arbitration of …read more